A court of the Eastern District of Texas adopted a magistrate's recommendation to deny an insurer's motion to preclude attorneys' fees under Chapter 542A, finding that the insured's pre-suit notice adequately provided a specific amount alleged to be owed and holding that the statute mandates only that the "specific" amount that must be included in the notice letter is "for damage to or loss of covered property."
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login