The court declined to consider an affidavit prepared by the insureds' engineer to support their response to the insurer's motion for summary judgment when the engineer was designated as a non-retained expert and the insureds did not previously present the substance of his opinions, and determined that there was no competent summary judgment evidence to establish that the property sustained damage during the policy period, and granted the insurer's motion for summary judgment.
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login