Cases

Mr. Cooper Group, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, PA

Court

ND Tx

Publish Date

03/19/2026

A court in the Northern District of Texas held in a criminal cyberattack coverage dispute that the insured’s motion to compel was granted in part, requiring the insurer to provide Rule 30(b)(6) testimony (subject to narrowing), answer interrogatories, and produce documents because its objections and privilege assertions were insufficient, while also ordering the parties to meet and confer on overbroad deposition topics.

Open Document

cyber risk policy, financial institution bond, computer crime coverage rider, criminal cyberattack, motion to compel discovery, deposition, interrogatories, objections, privilege, production, underwriting, relevance, work product, breach of contract, FRCP 26(b)(1), FRCP 30(b)(6), FRCP 33, FRCP 37(a)(3)(B)