A court of the Southern District of Texas granted an insurer’s motion for summary judgment in a dispute between an insurer and a third-party claimant under a commercial liability policy, adopting a magistrate’s recommendation and holding that the insurer had no obligation to indemnify or satisfy an interlocutory negligence judgment entered in an underlying personal-injury action because the state court later dismissed the case for want of prosecution, which vacated the interlocutory summary judgment and left the claimant without a final judgment or standing to recover under the policy.
