A court of the Eastern District of Texas granted in part an insurers’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed a judgment-claimant’s direct action against multiple insurers, holding that Fifth Circuit precedent regarding the overlap between the no-direct-action rule and the fully adversarial trial rule requires dismissal for lack of standing where the judgment against the insured in the underlying litigation did not dispose of all parties and causes of action and the policy’s “no-action” clause required a final judgment.
