A magistrate of the Northern District of Texas accepted an insurer's submission of an insured's pre-suit demand letter as evidence supporting that the amount-in-controversy requirement is met following the court's prior sua sponte order indicating that the the amount in controversy had not been established at the time of removal where the insurer relied upon the insured's state court petition that pleaded "$250,000 or less" pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 47.
Reviewing the Case Document is for members only. Please login