The Insurance Law Section is an official, sanctioned section of the State Bar of Texas consisting of approximately 2,300 members. Membership is open to all members of the State Bar of Texas.
Our Mission: Promoting collegiality and educating the bench, bar, and public about Texas insurance law.
Join The Section
The Insurance Law Section is governed by a Council elected from the Section membership at the Section’s annual meeting. Section officers are elected from and by the Council
Recent Decisions
Randel v. Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Co.
Court: 5th Cir 08/12/2021
Fifth Circuit Holds Payment of Appraisal Award Does Not Bar Chapter 542 Claims
343 West Sunset, LLC v. Seneca Insurance Co.
Court: WD Tx 08/11/2021
Magistrate Recommends Grant of Summary Judgment to Insurer in Hail Dispute
Smith v. Insurance Adjusters Group, LLC
Court: ED Tx 08/11/2021
Magistrate Recommends Dismissal of Claims in Dispute Between Public Adjusters
Woodcrest Capital, LLC v. Zurich American Insurance Co.
Court: WD Tx 08/11/2021
Court Holds Chapter 542 Claims Subject to Four-Year Limitations Period Despite Two-Years-and-One-Day Policy Limitation
GeoVera Specialty Insurance Co. v. Walker
Court: SD Tx 08/09/2021
District Court Grants Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment in Hail and Theft Dispute
Volvo Financial Services v. McClenny Moseley & Assoc.
Court: WD Tx 08/09/2021
Magistrate Recommends Denial of Summary Judgment in Dispute Over Competing Liens on Insurance Proceeds
Graileys, Inc. v. Sentinel Insurance Co.
Court: ND Tx 08/09/2021
Court Grants Motion to Dismiss COVID-19 Related Claims for Coverage Under Commercial Property Policy
Cocanougher Asset No. 3 v. Twin City Fire Insurance Co.
Court: ND Tx 08/06/2021
Court Holds Whether Insurer Knew Claim Was Covered At Time of Denial Constitutes a Fact Question
Chaudhary v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
Court: SD Tx 08/05/2021
District Court Issues Mixed Ruling on Motion to Dismiss in Insurance Placement Dispute
Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Co. v. Chemicals, Inc.
Court: SD Tx 08/05/2021
District Court Determines That Insurer Owes Duty to Defend in MDL Proceeding